Web 2.0 in Health Care - Where's the Value

    Today I was interviewed by Government HealthIT regarding Web 2.0 adoption in Healthcare. If you have been reading my blog, you know my answer is - gradual adoption, wait and see.  Some of the reasons for this is that Web 2.0 is a disruptive technology and especially so toward healthcare.  Specifically, health care organizations, especially hospitals and medical practices are risk adverse (read libability crisis). Healthcare typically view information as authorative and works hard at controlling that authority through clinical trials and the peer review process. This way health care information is owned by authoritative sources which maintain the pubic's trust.  Web 2.0 promotes that content is owned by all and that truth is acheived through social networking (e.g., Wikipedia).  At the same time, healthcare has always been a collaborative science and for decades, patient advocacy movements, such as, cancer survivors, have interacted online in social networks. 
Conclusion: Web 2.0 concepts have been present in healthcare for a long time but at the same time the technology is perceived as a threat. A contradiction? No, just a social trend which will take time to sort out.

Technorati: Web 2.0

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 3/8/2007 10:59 AM flupianez wrote:
    Very interesting post. I think we have a great initiative of Web 2.0 in the healthcare sector. It is called Patient Opinion (http://www.ictconsequences.net/?p=31)
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.